PDF ArchiveHistorical archive . public document
2012 . April . 17

April 16 Solutions

April 16 Solutions.pdf

PDF 1.4 2 pages 22.54 KB Filed 17/04/2012
Download this PDF
April 16 Solutions.pdf
Web reader . 2 pages
Page 2 of 2, April 16 Solutions
2 / 2

File preview

In-Class Questions for April 16th 1. Which of the following questions does L’Hospital’s rule apply to? If L’Hospital’s applies, use it to calculate the limit; if not, calculate the limit using other rules. x2 + 1 x→1 x − 2 (a) lim Well, we can compute this limit by directly plugging in 1. L’Hospital’s rule is not necessary here because the limit is not of an indeterminant form. The only time we should use this method is when the limit produces 00 or ∞ ∞. (12 ) + 1 x2 + 1 = x→1 x − 2 (1 − 2) 2 = −1 = -2 lim (b) lim x→0 sin x x For this limit, we notice that if we directly plug zero into the limit, we obtain the indeterminate form 00 , which is exactly the case when we should use L’Hospital’s rule. sin x (sin x)′ = lim x→0 x x→0 (x)′ cos x = lim x→0 1 cos(0) = 1 1 = 1 = 1 lim 1 (c) lim+ x→1 x2 1−x It is not necessary to use L’Hospital’s rule to calculate this limit because it would not be of an indeterminant form to plug in a number a little to the right of 1, which should give us a decent idea as to what the limit is doing as it approaches 1 from the right hand side. lim+ x→1 (1.001)2 x2 = 1−x 1 − (1.001) = 1 small negative number = −∞ 2. Calculate lim x ln x x→0+ by rearranging it as a fraction and then using L’Hospital’s (check that using it is appropriate!). Try both ways of rearranging it to see which one works best. We must approach this problem in a different manner; L’Hospital’s rule applies to ratios of functions, that is to say, we need to make x ln x look like one function is dividing the other. We can do this in two ways: lim x ln x = lim x→0+ x→0+ ln x 1 x = lim x→0+ x 1 ln x (ln x)′ (x)′ = lim 1 ′ x→0+ ( ) x→0+ ( 1 )′ x ln x) = lim ( x1 ) (1) = lim (1) x→0+ (− 12 ) x→0+ − x 2 x = lim (ln x) −x2 = lim = lim −x(ln x)2 x→0+ x x→0+ = lim −x = Something ugly doing it this way. x→0+ = 0 The first column of equations represents the first way we could have done this, and it is actually gets us in the right direction. The second way, which is putting ln (x) on the bottom, is actually counter productive because we must use the quotient rule (or recipricol rule) to calculate the lower derivative. It becomes messy, and we still can’t calculate it. 2

Download April 16 Solutions

April 16 Solutions.pdf . PDF . 22.54 KB . 2 pages

Download PDF

File information

File name
April 16 Solutions.pdf
Size
22.54 KB
Pages
2 pages
PDF version
1.4
Produced with
TeX output 2012.04.16:2057 / MiKTeX-dvipdfmx (20090708 svn texlive 14695)
Filed on
17/04/2012
Page views
691
Document ID
april-16-solutions
MD5
30a2ce8666cb7a3319138d2cb652d8fb
SHA-512
9690350564411723973e25bed5075835ca96384cb2f7e5d9e721229274d3346b4db319cdbcb28aa7aeec5d1af4b59c88a7ca6386f9d7548f965355c2b13e99db

Share this document

This address never changes. It is the one to keep, to send, or to cite.

Shorter, for a text message or a post with a character limit.

To link to this document from a website or a blog.