Guidelines for project judgement tk kt .pdf

File information


Original filename: Guidelines for project judgement_tk_kt.pdf
Author: Kathrin

This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Microsoft® Office Word 2007, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 03/06/2013 at 15:39, from IP address 213.47.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 2330 times.
File size: 323 KB (2 pages).
Privacy: public file


Download original PDF file


Guidelines for project judgement_tk_kt.pdf (PDF, 323 KB)


Share on social networks



Link to this file download page



Document preview


Innsbruck Social Innovation Challenge

Guidelines for Project Judgement of the Social Innovation Challenge
In order to judge the projects several factors should be considered as well as the coherence of the
entire project. Below a list of variables is given on which each project should be rated to form an
overall judgement of the project.

1. Feasibility
1.1 General Feasibility
 Can the project really be realised?
 What does it need to be realised? - Is it possible to organise and get all resources needed?
 What are barriers which might prevent realisation?
1.2 Financial Feasibility
 How much money does it cost to realize the project?
 Where does the money come from? - How likely is it to receive a grant, credit or other
financial support for the project.
 Will the project break through and be able to sustain itself or will it always be relying on
sponsoring?

3. Impact







What is the social impact of the project?
Who is benefiting from the project? - are there also any "loosers" who might be worse of
then before?
Is the impact immediate or long-term focused?
Is the impact sustainable?
What is the public interest in this project?
How can the project adapt to the context in ways that are within the project’s control?

4. Community engagement





How does the project relate to a current or local social problem?
Does the project engage the community?
How does the project team relate to the problem? - What is there motivation to help solving
the problem?
Are there any other projects/groups/organisation who take care of the problem? - How do
they differentiate?

5. Innovativeness





Does the project provide a new solution to a problem?
How innovative is the solution to the social problem
Does the project team approach the problem in a creative way?
Does a similar solution already exists? - What are the differences/similarities?

6. Coherence


Is the approach of the project coherent?

Innsbruck Social Innovation Challenge


Are there any short-comings? - If yes, can they be overcome?

7. Learning





Has there been a learning process of the group during the 48hrs innovation challenge?
How responsive has the team been to arising problems/challenges?
Did the group leverage on the "wisdom of the crowd"?
Has the group been able to answer tough questions about their innovation?

By considering all these aspects, an overall judgement of each project should be made leading to a
ranking of all projects of the Social Innovation Challenge. The three highest ranked projects might be
rewarded and supported with a financial award.


Document preview Guidelines for project judgement_tk_kt.pdf - page 1/2

Document preview Guidelines for project judgement_tk_kt.pdf - page 2/2

Related documents


guidelines for project judgement tk kt
hacking the hype why hackathons don t work techcrunch
8194 02 make sense not stuff design observer
position paper midterm review clora
aruba declaration 2017
ctg topic

Link to this page


Permanent link

Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..

Short link

Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)

HTML Code

Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog

QR Code

QR Code link to PDF file Guidelines for project judgement_tk_kt.pdf