Guidelines for project judgement tk kt (PDF)

File information

Author: Kathrin

This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Microsoft® Office Word 2007, and has been sent on on 03/06/2013 at 17:39, from IP address 213.47.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 2365 times.
File size: 330.26 KB (2 pages).
Privacy: public file

File preview

Innsbruck Social Innovation Challenge

Guidelines for Project Judgement of the Social Innovation Challenge
In order to judge the projects several factors should be considered as well as the coherence of the
entire project. Below a list of variables is given on which each project should be rated to form an
overall judgement of the project.

1. Feasibility
1.1 General Feasibility
 Can the project really be realised?
 What does it need to be realised? - Is it possible to organise and get all resources needed?
 What are barriers which might prevent realisation?
1.2 Financial Feasibility
 How much money does it cost to realize the project?
 Where does the money come from? - How likely is it to receive a grant, credit or other
financial support for the project.
 Will the project break through and be able to sustain itself or will it always be relying on

3. Impact

What is the social impact of the project?
Who is benefiting from the project? - are there also any "loosers" who might be worse of
then before?
Is the impact immediate or long-term focused?
Is the impact sustainable?
What is the public interest in this project?
How can the project adapt to the context in ways that are within the project’s control?

4. Community engagement

How does the project relate to a current or local social problem?
Does the project engage the community?
How does the project team relate to the problem? - What is there motivation to help solving
the problem?
Are there any other projects/groups/organisation who take care of the problem? - How do
they differentiate?

5. Innovativeness

Does the project provide a new solution to a problem?
How innovative is the solution to the social problem
Does the project team approach the problem in a creative way?
Does a similar solution already exists? - What are the differences/similarities?

6. Coherence

Is the approach of the project coherent?

Innsbruck Social Innovation Challenge

Are there any short-comings? - If yes, can they be overcome?

7. Learning

Has there been a learning process of the group during the 48hrs innovation challenge?
How responsive has the team been to arising problems/challenges?
Did the group leverage on the "wisdom of the crowd"?
Has the group been able to answer tough questions about their innovation?

By considering all these aspects, an overall judgement of each project should be made leading to a
ranking of all projects of the Social Innovation Challenge. The three highest ranked projects might be
rewarded and supported with a financial award.

Download Guidelines for project judgement tk kt

Guidelines for project judgement_tk_kt.pdf (PDF, 330.26 KB)

Download PDF

Share this file on social networks


Link to this page

Permanent link

Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..

Short link

Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)


Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog

QR Code to this page

QR Code link to PDF file Guidelines for project judgement_tk_kt.pdf

This file has been shared publicly by a user of PDF Archive.
Document ID: 0000107619.
Report illicit content