PDF ArchiveHistorical archive . public document

Final Presentation, 18 October 2016

Final Presentation, 18 October 2016.pdf . by Laura Oakley

PDF 1.5 35 pages 3.56 MB Filed 31/10/2016
Download this PDF
Final Presentation, 18 October 2016.pdf
Web reader . 5 pages of 35
Page 5 of 35, Final Presentation, 18 October 2016
5 / 5

End of preview: 5 of 35 pages shown. 30 more pages are in the file itself. Download the full PDF.

File preview

Professionalism under pressure #profpressures Welcome #profpressures Welcome Nigel Clarke Chair, GPhC #profpressures Opening remarks Professor Nairn Wilson #profpressures Keynote address Professor Michael West Head of Thought Leadership, The King’s Fund #profpressures Nurturing Cultures of High Quality and Compassionate Care Professionalism under Pressure Michael West 6 Compassion Compassion • • • • Paying attention to the other – ‘listening with fascination’ Finding a shared understanding of the situation they face Being empathic Taking thoughtful, intelligent action to help 7 NHS cultures for high quality care 1. Prioritising an inspirational vision and narrative – focused on quality of care 2. A commitment to effective, efficient performance - Clear aligned goals and objectives at every level with helpful feedback 3. Good people management and employee engagement – compassionate leadership 4. Continuous learning and quality improvement 5. Enthusiastic team-working, cooperation, partnership and integration 6. Via a values-based, collective leadership strategy People management and engagement • Patient/service user satisfaction highest where staff have clear goals • Staff views of leaders linked to patients views of care quality • Staff satisfaction/commitment predicts patient/service user satisfaction • High work pressure - patients/service users report too few staff, insufficient support, privacy, respect. • Poor staff health and well-being, high injury rates, audit ratings • Good HRM practices - low patient mortality http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2011/08/nhs-staff-management/ Staff Stress Levels Lowest: • Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals • St Helens and Knowsley • Bedford • Frimley Park www.nhsstaffsurveys.com 10 3. Employee engagement success factors www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/staff-engagement A compelling strategic narrative Inclusive leadership and management styles Putting staff in charge of service change • Successful Trusts develop a clear narrative on their purpose and aims • Successful Trusts have invested in retraining staff to adopt inclusive management styles • Successful Trusts give staff responsibility for leading service change • Salford aimed to be the safest hospital in England • For example, Oxleas has introduced a substantial programme to retrain middle managers in facilitative leadership • The happiness of all our staff, through their worthwhile, satisfying employment in a successful business • Notts Healthcare NHS FT develops leadership aligned around strategy and values • Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh works with Unipart to support staff-led change • Salford’s quality directorate supports teams of frontline staff in testing improvements Values and Integrity • Staff survey evidence highlights importance of values and trust in senior leadership • Perceptions of unfairness are our best predictor of intention to leave • In particular, fairness of procedures, bullying and discrimination. Stable senior leadership Many of the Trusts with highest levels of engagement have had the same senior leaders for over a decade: CEO of Oxleas in post since 2002, CEO of Salford in post since 2002, CEO of Frimley Park in post since 1998, in comparison with an average CEO tenure of less than two years. Staff Engagement Best performing trusts • Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh • Northumbria • Frimley Park • Guys and St Thomas’ • Salford Based on www.nhsstaffsurveys.com 12 13 Positive emotion and culture • Leader positive affect, climate and performance • Processing negative emotion – ‘affective shift’ • Dealing with quarrelsome or disruptive behavior and poor performance 5. Team working, cooperation and integration Team Leadership • Offer an inspiring vision and clear direction • Ensure regular and positive team meetings • Encourage positive, supportive relationships • Resolve and prevent intense conflicts • Positive group attitudes towards diversity • Be attentive and listen carefully to the team • Lead inter-team cooperation • Nurture team learning, improvement & innovation 16 Collective Leadership • Leadership the responsibility of all - anyone with expertise taking responsibility when appropriate • Shared leadership in teams and across teams • Interdependent, collaborative leadership - working together to ensure high quality health and social care • Leaders and teams prioritising quality of care across the system/organisation • Consistent approach to leadership within the leadership community – continually improving, high quality and compassionate leadership http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/developing-collective-leadership-health-care West, M. A., Lyubovnikova, J., Eckert, R., & Denis, J.L. , (2014),Collective leadership for cultures of high quality health care. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1, 240 – 260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-07-2014-0039 ‘Compassionate leadership for compassionateCompassion health services’ • • • • Attending: paying attention to staff – ‘listening with fascination’ Understanding: finding a shared understanding of the situation they face Empathising Helping: taking intelligent action to help 18 e.mail m.west@kingsfund.org.uk Twitter @westm61 @astonod Thank you Modern professionalism and regulation Presented by Hugh Simpson Director of Strategy, GPhC What is professionalism? Professionalism under pressure: a regulatory perspective Learning from research New Public Management Quality Hybridity Employee relations Autonomy and professionalism Performance management and targets Literature Review (a sample) • Reay and Hinings (2009) on competing organisational logics • Bush et al (2009) on corporatisation • Elvey, R., Hassell, K., Lewis, P., Schafheutle, E., Willis, S., & Harrison, S. (2015). Patient-centred professionalism in pharmacy • Watson et al (2016) Factors predicting the guideline compliant supply (or nonsupply) of non-prescription medicines in the community pharmacy setting • Paudyal et al (2013) On substituting minor ailment services to reduce burdens • Jacobs et al (2013) Managing workplace stress Quality Quality gaps? 95% 83% 81% 64% Privacy maintained 83% 68% 88% 86% 80% 79% 72% 76% 80% 77% 77% 67% Asked Treatment Enough time Information Accessible Experienced Clean questions with respect and advice services team pharmacy Outcomes pharmacies believe they are delivering compared to public experiences Sources: ICF 2015, Ipsos Mori 2014 Closing the gap: November to December 2016 Some questions we will pose • What does quality mean to you? Are you measuring it? • What does quality looks like in your environment? • What has helped you delivery quality? • What are the barriers? What we are doing • Crowdsourcing end October to December: everyone we have an email address for • Public engagement (January-March) – Targeted research with users of pharmacy services, to explore their experiences of the quality of pharmacy services. • Reviewing our regulatory model for pharmacies: how we can focus on quality • Updating guidance on raising concerns • Guidance to employers - non-registrant staff THANK YOU Modern professionalism and regulation email hugh.simpson@pharmacyregulation.org phone 020 3365 3400 web pharmacyregulation.org twitter @TheGPhC facebook.com/The GPhC linkedin.com/company/general-pharmaceutical-council Workshop discussions Feedback from workshop sessions Professor Nairn Wilson #profpressures Closing remarks Duncan Rudkin Chief Executive, GPhC #profpressures Thank you! • • • • web pharmacyregulation.org twitter @TheGPhC facebook.com/The GPhC linkedin.com/company/general-pharmaceuticalcouncil

Download Final Presentation, 18 October 2016

Final Presentation, 18 October 2016.pdf . PDF . 3.56 MB . 35 pages

Download PDF

File information

File name
Final Presentation, 18 October 2016.pdf
Title
PowerPoint Presentation
Author
Laura Oakley
Size
3.56 MB
Pages
35 pages
PDF version
1.5
Produced with
Acrobat PDFMaker 15 for PowerPoint / Adobe PDF Library 15.0
Filed on
31/10/2016
Page views
326
Document ID
final-presentation-18-october-2016
MD5
eff6c1c31fe0d5872f6bea51e76a0201
SHA-512
a2d4f2dd75febac4feeccbcc6672d38f653dad568084f8332b5aac130154a31e07bf6bba96a87345c3c55ea6cdda75d808c41d9113e96b5bcbe70e66b326a72c

Share this document

This address never changes. It is the one to keep, to send, or to cite.

Shorter, for a text message or a post with a character limit.

To link to this document from a website or a blog.